Literary Criticism: Questions for a Variety of Approaches I. Formalistic Approach: This approach focuses on form. The analysis stresses items like symbols,
images, and structure and how one part of the work relates to other parts and to the whole.
How is the work’s structure unified?
How do various elements of the work reinforce its meaning?
What recurring patterns (repeated or related words, images, etc.) can you find? What is the effect of
these patterns or motifs?
How does repetition reinforce the theme(s)?
How does the writer’s diction reveal or reflect the work’s meaning?
What is the effect of the plot, and what parts specifically produce that effect?
What figures of speech are used? (metaphors, similes, etc.)
Note the writer’s use of paradox, irony, symbol, plot, characterization, and style of narration.
What effects are produced? Do any of these relate to one another or to the theme?
Is there a relationship between the beginning and the end of the story?
What tone and mood are created at various parts of the work?
How does the author create tone and mood? What relationship is there between tone and mood
and the effect of the story?
How do the various elements interact to create a unified whole?
II. Philosophical Approach:This approach focuses on themes, view of the world, moral statements,
author’s philosophy, etc.
What view of life does the story present? Which character best articulates this viewpoint?
According to this work’s view of life, what is mankind’s relationship to God? To the universe?
What moral statement, if any, does this story make? Is it explicit or implicit?
What is the author’s attitude toward his world? Toward fate? Toward God?
What is the author’s conception of good and evil?
What does the work say about the nature of good or evil?
What does the work say about human nature?
III. Biographical Approach:Focuses on connection of work to author’s personal experiences.
What aspects of the author’s personal life are relevant to this story?
Which of the author’s stated beliefs are reflected in the work?
Does the writer challenge or support the values of her contemporaries?
What seem to be the author’s major concerns? Do they reflect any of the writer’s personal
Do any of the events in the story correspond to events experienced by the author?
Do any of the characters in the story correspond to real people?
IV. Historical Approach:This approach focuses on connection of work to the historical period in which it was written; literary historians attempt to connect the historical background of the work to specific aspects of the work.
How does it reflect the time in which it was written?
How accurately does the story depict the time in which it is set?
What literary or historical influences helped to shape the form and content of the work?
How does the story reflect the attitudes and beliefs of the time in which it was written or set?
(Consider beliefs and attitudes related to race, religion, politics, gender, society, philosophy, etc.)
What other literary works may have influenced the writer?
What historical events or movements might have influenced this writer?
How would characters and events in this story have been viewed by the writer’s
Does the story reveal or contradict the prevailing values of the time in which it was written?
Does it provide an opposing view of the period’s prevailing values?
How important is it the historical context (the work’s and the reader’s) to interpreting the
V. Psychological Approach: This approach focuses on the psychology of characters.
What forces are motivating the characters?
Which behaviors of the characters are conscious ones?
Which are unconscious?
What conscious or unconscious conflicts exist between the characters?
Given their backgrounds, how plausible is the characters’ behavior?
Are the theories of Freud or other psychologists applicable to this work? To what degree?
Do any of the characters correspond to the parts of the tripartite self? (Id, ego, superego)
What roles do psychological disorders and dreams play in this story?
Are the characters recognizable psychological types?
How might a psychological approach account for different responses in female and male
How does the work reflect the writer’s personal psychology?
What do the characters’ emotions and behaviors reveal about their psychological states?
How does the work reflect the unconscious dimensions of the writer’s mind?
How does the reader’s own psychology affect his response to the work?
VI. Sociological Approach:This approach focuses on man’s relationship to others in society, politics, religion, and business.
What is the relationship between the characters and their society?
Does the story address societal issues, such as race, gender, and class?
How do social forces shape the power relationships between groups or classes of people in the
story? Who has the power, and who doesn’t? Why?
How does the story reflect the Great American Dream?
How does the story reflect urban, rural, or suburban values?
What does the work say about economic or social power? Who has it and who doesn’t? Any
Marxist leanings evident?
Does the story address issues of economic exploitation? What role does money play?
How do economic conditions determine the direction of the characters’ lives?
Does the work challenge or affirm the social order it depicts?
Can the protagonist’s struggle be seen as symbolic of a larger class struggle?
How does the microcosm (small world) of the story reflect the macrocosm (large world) of the
myth and literature; uses the psychological, archetypal, and sociological approaches; often focuses on female characters who have been neglected in previous criticism. Feminist critics attempt to correct or supplement what they regard as a predominantly male-dominated critical perspective.
How are women’s lives portrayed in the work?
Is the form and content of the work influenced by the writer’s gender?
How do male and female characters relate to one another? Are these relationships sources of
conflict? Are these conflicts resolved?
Does the work challenge or affirm traditional views of women?